Lil Durk in a green jacket and dark hoodie, blonde braids

Lil Durk’s Bond Hearing Ended With No Answer: The Judge Took It Under Submission, and Prosecutors Fought His Release With a Contraband Investigation

Lil Durk went into a Los Angeles courtroom Wednesday afternoon hoping to walk out of jail, and he went back to a cell with no answer. After a two hour bond hearing, Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald took the bail request under submission, meaning he will read the filings from both sides over the coming days before he decides anything.

The package on the table was the one his lawyers spent weeks building: his future royalties, publishing and touring money pledged as security, a Sony guarantee of up to $1 million, his mother’s home, and support letters from Jay-Z and J. Cole. Prosecutors noted the court has refused him bond four times before, and argued the new package still does not answer their flight risk and public safety concerns.

This familiar playbook to apply public pressure to these proceedings, in search of preferential treatment, should be rejected out of hand by this Court.

Federal prosecutors, in their November 4 filing opposing bond
Lil Durk in a black Adidas hoodie and black hat
Lil Durk. Photo: via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 3.0.

The feds did not stop at the letters. In a filing the same day, prosecutors disclosed an investigation into allegations that Durk helped bring contraband into the Metropolitan Detention Center in Los Angeles. They allege he used other inmates’ phone access, made impermissible three way calls, and used contraband communications devices to make hundreds of calls. They also say he was disciplined over a contraband cellphone he tried to destroy, and that he refused a cell search last week. He spent the days right before the hearing in solitary, after a Bureau of Prisons union representative confirmed he was moved on October 30 following repeated searches of his cell.

Reporters inside the courtroom said the allegations got stranger than phones. Prosecutors alleged Durk concealed a smuggled Apple Watch inside his body cavity, a claim his legal team has not publicly answered. A watch is not a new fight for him either: his lawyers blamed an alleged Apple Watch for an earlier stretch in solitary that began in August 2025.

Durk has been in custody since October 2024. A jury acquitted him of the murder for hire charges in September, but he has pleaded not guilty in the separate racketeering case, and that trial is not until August 30, 2027. If Fitzgerald says no again, he could sit for most of another year waiting on it. If the judge says yes, he goes home with basically his whole career posted as the bond. The answer lands in the coming days, not today.

SEE ALSO